Kabbalah, also spelled
Kabala or
Cabala (
Hebrew:
קַבָּלָה literally "receiving"), is an
esoteric method, discipline and school of thought. Its definition varies according to the tradition and aims of those following it,
[1] from its religious origin as an integral part of
Judaism. Kabbalah is a set of esoteric teachings meant to explain the relationship between an unchanging, eternal and mysterious
Ein Sof (no end) and the mortal and finite universe (his creation). While it is heavily used by some denominations, it is not a
religious denomination in itself. Inside Judaism, it forms the foundations of mystical religious interpretation. Outside Judaism, its
scriptures are read outside the traditional canons of organised religion. Kabbalah seeks to define the nature of the universe and the human being, the nature and purpose of existence, and various other
ontological questions. It also presents methods to aid understanding of these concepts and to thereby attain spiritual realisation.
Kabbalah originally developed entirely within the realm of
Jewish thought and kabbalists often use classical Jewish sources to explain and demonstrate its esoteric teachings. These teachings are thus held by followers in
Judaism to define the inner meaning of both the
Hebrew Bible and traditional
Rabbinic literature, their formerly concealed
transmitted dimension, as well as to explain the significance of Jewish
religious observances.
[2]
Traditional practitioners believe its earliest origins pre-date world religions, forming the primordial blueprint for Creation's
philosophies,
religions,
sciences,
arts and
political systems.
[3] Historically, Kabbalah emerged, after earlier forms of Jewish mysticism, in 12th- to 13th-century
Southern France and
Spain, becoming reinterpreted in the Jewish mystical renaissance of 16th-century
Ottoman Palestine. It was popularised in the form of
Hasidic Judaism from the 18th century onwards. 20th-century interest in Kabbalah has inspired cross-denominational
Jewish renewal and contributed to wider non-Jewish
contemporary spirituality, as well as engaging its
flourishing emergence and historical re-emphasis through newly established
academic investigation.
[edit] Overview
According to the
Zohar, a foundational text for kabbalistic thought,
Torah study can proceed along four levels of interpretation (
exegesis).
[4][5] These four levels are called
pardes from their initial letters (PRDS
Hebrew:
פרדס, orchard).
- Peshat (Hebrew: פשט lit. "simple"): the direct interpretations of meaning.
- Remez (Hebrew: רמז lit. "hint[s]"): the allegoric meanings (through allusion).
- Derash (Hebrew: דרש from Heb. darash: "inquire" or "seek"): midrashic (Rabbinic) meanings, often with imaginative comparisons with similar words or verses.
- Sod (Hebrew: סוד lit. "secret" or "mystery"): the inner, esoteric (metaphysical) meanings, expressed in kabbalah.
Kabbalah is considered by its followers as a necessary part of the study of
Torah – the study of Torah (the
Tanakh and
Rabbinic literature) being an inherent duty of observant Jews.
[6] Kabbalah teaches doctrines that are accepted by some Jews as the true meaning of Judaism while other Jews have rejected these doctrines as
heretical and antithetical to Judaism. After the Medieval Kabbalah, and especially after its 16th-century development and synthesis, Kabbalah replaced
Jewish philosophy (
hakira) as the mainstream traditional
Jewish theology,
[citation needed] both in scholarly circles and in the popular imagination. With the arrival of
modernity, through the influence of
haskalah, this has changed among non-Orthodox
Jewish denominations, although its 20th-century academic study and cross-denominational spiritual applications (especially through
Neo-Hasidism) has reawakened a following beyond
Orthodoxy.
The origins of the term "kabbalah" are unknown and disputed to belong either to Jewish
philosopher Solomon ibn Gabirol (1021–1058) or else to the 13th-century Spanish kabbalist
Bahya ben Asher. While other terms have been used in many religious documents from the 2nd century up to the present day, the term "kabbalah" has become the main descriptive of Jewish esoteric knowledge and practices.
[citation needed] Jewish mystical literature, which served as the basis for the development of kabbalistic thought, developed through a theological tradition inherent in Judaism from Antiquity, as part of wider
Rabbinic literature. Its theoretical development can be characterised in alternative schools and successive stages. After the
Hebrew Bible experience of prophecy, the first documented schools of specifically mystical theory and method in Judaism are found in the 1st-2nd centuries, described in the
heichalot (supernal "palaces") texts and the earliest existent book on Jewish esotericism,
Sefer Yetzirah. Their method, known as
Merkabah (contemplation of the Divine "Chariot") mysticism lasted until the 10th century, where it was subsumed by the Medieval doctrinal emergence of the Kabbalah in south-western Europe in the 12th-13th centuries. Its teachings, embodied in the
Zohar, became the foundation of later Jewish mysticism, becoming re-interpreted in the early-modern developments of 16th-century
Safed in the Galilee, through the new system of
Isaac Luria.
Lurianic Kabbalah became popularised as a social mysticism for the whole Jewish community through 18th-century
Hasidism in eastern Europe, and its new notions of mystical leadership.
Modern
academic-historical study of Jewish mysticism reserves the term "kabbalah" to designate the particular, distinctive doctrines that textually emerged fully expressed in the Middle Ages, as distinct from the earlier Merkabah mystical concepts and methods.
[7] According to this descriptive categorisation, both versions of Kabbalistic theory, the medieval-Zoharic and the early-modern Lurianic together comprise the
theosophical tradition in Kabbalah, while the
meditative-ecstatic Kabbalah incorporates a parallel inter-related Medieval tradition. A third tradition, related but more shunned, involves the magical aims of
Practical Kabbalah. Moshe Idel, for example, writes that these 3 basic models can be discerned operating and competing throughout the whole history of Jewish mysticism, beyond the particular Kabbalistic background of the Middle Ages.
[8] They can be readily distinguished by their basic intent with respect to God:
- The Theosophical tradition (the main focus of the Zohar and Luria) seeks to understand and describe the divine realm. As an alternative to rationalist Jewish philosophy, particularly Maimonides' Aristotelianism, this became the central component of Kabbalah
- The Ecstatic tradition of Jewish meditation (exemplified by Abulafia and Isaac of Acre) strives to achieve a mystical union with God. Abraham Abulafia's "Prophetic Kabbalah" was the supreme example of this, though marginal in Kabbalistic development, and his alternative to the program of theosophical Kabbalah
- The Magico-theurgical tradition of Practical Kabbalah (in often unpublished manuscripts) endeavours to alter both the Divine realms and the World. While some interpretations of prayer see its role as manipulating heavenly forces, Practical Kabbalah properly involved white-magical acts, and was censored by kabbalists for only those completely pure of intent. Consequently it formed a separate minor tradition shunned from Kabbalah
According to traditional belief, early kabbalistic knowledge was transmitted orally by the
Patriarchs,
prophets, and sages (
hakhamim in
Hebrew), eventually to be "interwoven" into Jewish religious writings and culture. According to this view, early kabbalah was, in around the 10th century BC, an open knowledge practiced by over a million people in ancient Israel.
[9] Foreign conquests drove the Jewish spiritual leadership of the time (the
Sanhedrin) to hide the knowledge and make it secret, fearing that it might be misused if it fell into the wrong hands.
[10] The Sanhedrin leaders were also concerned that the practice of kabbalah by Jews of the
Jewish diaspora, unsupervised and unguided by the masters, might lead them into wrong practice and forbidden ways. As a result, the kabbalah became secretive, forbidden and
esoteric to Judaism (
Torat Ha’Sod תורת הסוד) for two and a half millennia.
[citation needed]
It is hard to clarify with any degree of certainty the exact concepts within kabbalah. There are several different schools of thought with very different outlooks; however, all are accepted as correct.
[11] Modern
halakhic authorities have tried to narrow the scope and diversity within kabbalah, by restricting study to certain texts, notably Zohar and the teachings of
Isaac Luria as passed down through
Hayyim ben Joseph Vital.
[12] However even this qualification does little to limit the scope of understanding and expression, as included in those works are commentaries on Abulafian writings,
Sefer Yetzirah, Albotonian writings, and the
Berit Menuhah,
[13] which is known to the kabbalistic elect and which, as described more recently by
Gershom Scholem, combined
ecstatic with
theosophical mysticism. It is therefore important to bear in mind when discussing things such as the
sefirot and their interactions that one is dealing with highly abstract concepts that at best can only be understood intuitively.
[14]
[edit] History of Jewish mysticism
[edit] Origins of Judaic mysticism
According to the traditional understanding, Kabbalah dates from Eden.
[15] It came down from a remote past as a revelation to elect
Tzadikim (righteous people), and, for the most part, was preserved only by a privileged few. Talmudic Judaism records its view of the proper protocol for teaching this wisdom, as well as many of its concepts, in the
Talmud, Tractate
Hagigah, Ch.2.
Contemporary scholarship suggests that various schools of Jewish
esotericism arose at different periods of Jewish history, each reflecting not only prior forms of
mysticism, but also the intellectual and cultural milieu of that historical period. Answers to questions of transmission, lineage, influence, and innovation vary greatly and cannot be easily summarized.
[edit] Origins of terms
Originally, Kabbalistic knowledge was believed to be an integral part of the
Judaism's oral law (see also
Aggadah), given by
God to
Moses on
Mount Sinai around 13th century BCE, though there is a view that Kabbalah began with Adam.
When the Israelites arrived at their destination and settled in Canaan, for a few centuries the esoteric knowledge was referred to by its aspect practice—meditation
Hitbonenut (
Hebrew:
התבוננות),
[16] Rebbe
Nachman of Breslov's
Hitbodedut (
Hebrew:
התבודדות), translated as "being alone" or "isolating oneself", or by a different term describing the actual, desired goal of the practice—
prophecy ("
NeVu’a"
Hebrew:
נבואה).
During the 5th century BCE, when the works of the
Tanakh were edited and canonized and the secret knowledge encrypted within the various writings and scrolls ("Megilot"), the knowledge was referred to as
Ma'aseh Merkavah (
Hebrew:
מעשה מרכבה)
[17] and
Ma'aseh B'reshit (
Hebrew:
מעשה בראשית),
[18] respectively "the act of the Chariot" and "the act of Creation". Merkavah mysticism alluded to the encrypted knowledge within the book of the prophet
Ezekiel describing his vision of the "Divine Chariot". B'reshit mysticism referred to the first chapter of
Genesis (
Hebrew:
בראשית) in the
Torah that is believed to contain secrets of the creation of the universe and forces of nature. These terms are also mentioned in the second chapter of the Talmudic tractate
Haggigah.
[edit] Mystic elements of the Torah
According to adherents of Kabbalah, its origin begins with secrets that God revealed to Adam. According to a rabbinic midrash
[citation needed] God created the universe through the Ten
Sefirot. When read by later generations of Kabbalists, the
Torah's description of the creation in the
Book of Genesis reveals mysteries about the godhead itself, the true nature of
Adam and Eve, the
Garden of Eden, the
Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and the
Tree of Life, as well as the interaction of these supernal entities with the
Serpent which leads to disaster when they eat the
forbidden fruit, as recorded in Genesis 3.
[19]
The Bible provides ample additional material for mythic and mystical speculation. The prophet
Ezekiel's visions in particular attracted much mystical speculation, as did Isaiah's Temple vision—
Isaiah, Ch.6.
Jacob's vision of the
ladder to heaven provided another example of esoteric experience.
Moses' encounters with the
Burning bush and God on
Mount Sinai are evidence of mystical events in the
Tanakh that form the origin of Jewish mystical beliefs.
The
72 letter name of God which is used in Jewish mysticism for meditation purposes is derived from the Hebrew verbal utterance Moses spoke in the presence of an angel, while the
Sea of Reeds parted, allowing the Hebrews to escape their approaching attackers. The miracle of the Exodus, which led to Moses receiving the
Ten Commandments and the Jewish Orthodox view of the acceptance of the
Torah at
Mount Sinai, preceded the creation of the first Jewish nation approximately three hundred years before
King Saul.
[edit] Mystical doctrines in the Talmudic era
In early
rabbinic Judaism (the early centuries of the first millennium CE), the terms
Ma'aseh Bereshit ("Works of Creation") and
Ma'aseh Merkabah ("Works of the Divine Throne/Chariot") clearly indicate the
Midrashic nature of these speculations; they are really based upon
Genesis 1 and
Book of Ezekiel 1:4–28; while the names
Sitrei Torah (Hidden aspects of the Torah) (Talmud
Hag. 13a) and
Razei Torah (Torah secrets) (
Ab. vi. 1) indicate their character as secret lore. An additional term also expanded Jewish esoteric knowledge, namely
Chochmah Nistara (Hidden wisdom).
Talmudic doctrine forbade the public teaching of esoteric doctrines and warned of their dangers. In the
Mishnah (Hagigah 2:1), rabbis were warned to teach the mystical creation doctrines only to one student at a time.
[20] To highlight the danger, in one
Jewish aggadic ("legendary") anecdote, four prominent
rabbis of the
Mishnaic period (1st century CE) are said to have visited the
Orchard (that is,
Paradise,
pardes,
Hebrew:
פרדס lit.,
orchard):
In notable readings of this legend, only Rabbi Akiba was fit to handle the study of mystical doctrines. The
Tosafot, medieval commentaries on the Talmud, say that the four sages "did not go up literally, but it appeared to them as if they went up".
[23] On the other hand, Rabbi
Louis Ginzberg, writes in the
Jewish Encyclopedia (1901–1906) that the journey to paradise "is to be taken literally and not allegorically".
[24] For further analysis, see
The Four Who Entered Paradise.
Maimonides interprets
pardes as physics and not mysticism.
[25][need quotation to verify]
[edit] Pre-Kabbalistic schools
The mystical methods and doctrines of
Hekhalot (Heavenly "Chambers") and
Merkabah (Divine "Chariot") texts, named by modern scholars from these repeated motifs, lasted from the 1st century BCE through to the 10th century, before giving way to the documented manuscript emergence of Kabbalah. Initiates were said to "descend the chariot", possibly a reference to internal introspection on the Heavenly journey through the spiritual realms. The ultimate aim was to arrive before the
transcendent awe, rather than nearness, of the Divine. From the 8th–11th centuries,
Sefer Yetzirah and Hekhalot texts made their way into European Jewish circles.
Another, separate influential mystical movement, shortly before the arrival there of Kabbalistic theory, was the "
Hasidei Ashkenaz" (חסידי אשכנז) or Medieval German Pietists from 1150-1250. This ethical-ascetic movement arose mostly among a single scholarly family, the
Kalonymus family of the French and German Rhineland.
[edit] Medieval emergence of the Kabbalah
Modern scholars have identified several mystical brotherhoods that functioned in Europe starting in the 12th century. Some, such as the "Iyyun Circle" and the "Unique Cherub Circle", were truly esoteric, remaining largely anonymous.
There were certain
rishonim ("Elder Sages") of exoteric Judaism who are known to have been experts in Kabbalah. One of the best known is
Nahmanides (the
Ramban) (1194–1270) whose commentary on the
Torah is considered to be based on Kabbalistic knowledge.
Bahya ben Asher (the
Rabbeinu Behaye) (d. 1340) also combined Torah commentary and Kabbalah. Another was
Isaac the Blind (1160–1235), the teacher of Nahmanides, who is widely argued to have written the first work of classic Kabbalah, the
Bahir.
Sefer Bahir and another work, the "Treatise of the Left Emanation", probably composed in Spain by
Isaac ben Isaac ha-Kohen, laid the groundwork for the composition of
Sefer Zohar, written by
Moses de Leon and his mystical circle at the end of the 13th century, but credited to the Talmudic sage
Shimon bar Yochai, cf.
Zohar. The Zohar proved to be the first truly "popular" work of Kabbalah, and the most influential. From the 13th century onward, Kabbalah began to be widely disseminated and it branched out into an extensive literature. Historians in the 19th century, for example,
Heinrich Graetz, argued that the emergence into public view of Jewish esotericism at this time coincides with, and represents a response to, the rising influence of the rationalist philosophy of
Maimonides and his followers.
Gershom Scholem sought to undermine this view as part of his resistance to seeing Kabbalah as merely a response to medieval Jewish rationalism. Arguing for a gnostic influence has to be seen as part of this strategy. More recently, Moshe Idel and Elliot Wolfson have independently argued that the impact of Maimonides can be seen in the change from orality to writing in the 13th century. That is, Kabbalists committed to writing many of their oral traditions in part as a response to the attempt of Maimonides to explain the older esoteric subjects philosophically.
Many
Orthodox Jews reject the idea that Kabbalah underwent significant historical development or change such as has been proposed above. After the composition known as the
Zohar was presented to the public in the 13th century, the term "Kabbalah" began to refer more specifically to teachings derived from, or related, to the
Zohar. At an even later time, the term began to generally be applied to Zoharic teachings as elaborated upon by
Isaac Luria Arizal. Historians generally date the start of Kabbalah as a major influence in Jewish thought and practice with the publication of the Zohar and climaxing with the spread of the
Arizal's teachings. The majority of
Haredi Jews accept the Zohar as the representative of the
Ma'aseh Merkavah and
Ma'aseh B'reshit that are referred to in Talmudic texts.
[26]
[edit] Early Modern era: Lurianic Kabbalah
The leading scholars in 16th-century
Safed invigorated mainstream Judaism through new legal, liturgical, exegetical and Lurianic-mythological developments
Following the upheavals and dislocations in the Jewish world as a result of the
Spanish Inquisition, the expulsion of the Jews from Spain in 1492, and the trauma of
anti-semitism during the
Middle Ages, Jews began to search for signs of when the long-awaited
Jewish Messiah would come to comfort them in their painful exiles.
Moses Cordovero and his immediate circle popularized the teachings of the Zohar which had until then been only a modestly influential work. The author of the
Shulkhan Arukh (the Jewish "Code of Law"), Rabbi
Yosef Karo (1488–1575), was also a great scholar of Kabbalah and spread its teachings during this era.
As part of that "search for meaning" in their lives, kabbalah received its biggest boost in the Jewish world with the explication of the kabbalistic teachings of Rabbi
Isaac Luria (1534–1572) by his disciples Rabbi
Hayim Vital and Rabbi
Israel Sarug, both of whom published Luria's teachings (in variant forms) gaining them widespread popularity. Luria's teachings came to rival the influence of the Zohar and Luria stands, alongside
Moses de Leon, as the most influential mystic in Jewish history.
[edit] Ban on studying Kabbalah
"I have seen it written that the prohibition from Above to refrain from open study in the wisdom of truth was only for a limited period, until the end of 1490, but from then on the prohibition has been lifted and permission was granted to study the Zohar. Since 1540 it has been a great Mitzva (commandment) for the masses to study in public, old and young… and that is because the Messiah will come because of that and not because of any other reason. Therefore, we must not be negligent."
Rabbi Abraham Ben Mordechai Azulai, Introduction to the book, Ohr HaChama [Light of the Sun]
[27]
The ban on studying Kabbalah was lifted by the efforts of the 16th-century kabbalist Rabbi
Avraham Azulai (1570–1643).
"I have found it written that all that has been decreed Above forbidding open involvement in the Wisdom of Truth [Kabbalah] was [only meant for] the limited time period until the year 5,250 (1490 C.E.). From then on after is called the "Last Generation", and what was forbidden is [now] allowed. And permission is granted to occupy ourselves in the [study of] Zohar. And from the year 5,300 (1540 C.E.) it is most desirable that the masses both those great and small [in Torah], should occupy themselves [in the study of Kabbalah], as it says in the Raya M'hemna [a section of the Zohar]. And because in this merit King Mashiach will come in the future—and not in any other merit—it is not proper to be discouraged [from the study of Kabbalah]."
[28]
The question, however, is whether the ban ever existed in the first place. Concerning the above quote by Avraham Azulai, it has found many versions in English, another is this
"From the year 1540 and onward, the basic levels of Kabbalah must be taught publicly to everyone, young and old. Only through Kabbalah will we forever eliminate war, destruction, and man's inhumanity to his fellow man."
[29]
The lines concerning the year 1490 are also missing from the Hebrew edition of
Hesed L'Avraham, the source work that both of these quote from. Furthermore, by Azulai's view the ban was lifted thirty years before his birth, a time that would have corresponded with Haim Vital's publication of the teaching of Isaac Luria. Moshe Isserles understood there to be only a minor restriction, in his words, "One's belly must be full of meat and wine, discerning between the prohibited and the permitted."
[30] He is supported by the Bier Hetiv, the Pithei Teshuva as well as the
Vilna Gaon. The Vilna Gaon says, "There was never any ban or enactment restricting the study of the wisdom of Kabbalah. Any who says there is has never studied Kabbalah, has never seen PaRDeS, and speaks as an ignoramous."
[31]
[edit] Sefardi and Mizrahi
The kabbalah of the
Sefardi (Portuguese or Spanish) and
Mizrahi (Middle East, North Africa, and the Caucasus) Torah scholars has a long history. Kabbalah in various forms was widely studied, commented upon, and expanded by North African, Turkish, Yemenite, and Asian scholars from the 16th century onward. It flourished among Sefardic Jews in Tzfat (
Safed), Israel even before the arrival of Isaac Luria.
Yosef Karo, author of the
Shulchan Arukh was part of the Tzfat school of kabbalah.
Shlomo Alkabetz, author of the hymn
Lekhah Dodi, taught there.
His disciple
Moses ben Jacob Cordovero authored
Pardes Rimonim, an organized, exhaustive compilation of kabbalistic teachings on a variety of subjects up to that point. Cordovero headed the academy of Tzfat until his death, when
Isaac Luria rose to prominence. Rabbi Moshe's disciple
Eliyahu De Vidas authored the classic work,
Reishit Chochma, combining kabbalistic and
mussar (moral) teachings.
Chaim Vital also studied under Cordovero, but with the arrival of Luria became his main disciple. Vital claimed to be the only one authorized to transmit the Ari's teachings, though other disciples also published books presenting Luria's teachings.
[edit] Maharal
The 16th-century
Maharal of Prague articulated a mystical exegesis in philosophical language
One of the most important teachers of kabbalah was
Judah Loew ben Bezalel (1525–1609) known as the "Maharal of Prague". Many of his written works survive and are studied for their deep kabbalistic insights. The Maharal is, perhaps, most famous outside of Jewish mysticism for the legends of the
golem of Prague, which he reportedly created. During the 20th century,
Isaac Hutner (1906–1980) continued to spread the Maharal's teachings indirectly through his own teachings and scholarly publications within the
yeshiva world.
[edit] Sabbatian mysticism
The spiritual and mystical yearnings of many Jews remained frustrated after the death of Isaac Luria and his disciples and colleagues. No hope was in sight for many following the devastation and mass killings of the
pogroms that followed in the wake the
Chmielnicki Uprising (1648–1654), and it was at this time that a controversial scholar of the kabbalah by the name of
Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676) captured the hearts and minds of the Jewish masses of that time with the promise of a newly minted "Messianic"
Millennialism in the form of his own personage.
His charisma, mystical teachings that included repeated pronunciations of the holy
Tetragrammaton in public, tied to an unstable personality, and with the help of his own "prophet",
Nathan of Gaza, convinced the Jewish masses that the
Jewish Messiah had finally come. It seemed that the esoteric teachings of kabbalah had found their "champion" and had triumphed, but this era of Jewish history unravelled when Zevi became an
apostate to Judaism by converting to
Islam after he was arrested by the
Ottoman Sultan and threatened with execution for attempting a plan to conquer the world and rebuild the
Temple in Jerusalem.
Many of his followers, known as
Sabbatians, continued to worship him in secret, explaining his conversion not as an effort to save his life but to recover the sparks of the holy in each religion, and most leading rabbis were always on guard to root them out. The
Donmeh movement in modern Turkey is a surviving remnant of the Sabbatian schism.
Due to the chaos caused in the Jewish world, the Rabbinic prohibition against studying kabbalah established itself firmly within the Jewish religion. One of the conditions allowing a man to study and engage himself in the kabbalah was to be of age forty. This age requirement came about during this period and is not
Talmudic in origin but
Rabbinic. Many Jews are familiar with this ruling, but are not aware of its origins. Moreover, the prohibition is not halakhic in nature. According to Moses Cordovero, halakhically, one must be of age twenty to engage in the kabbalah. Many famous kabbalists, including the
ARI,
Rabbi Nachman of Breslov,
Yehuda Ashlag, were younger than twenty when they began.
[edit] Frankism
The Sabbatian movement was followed by that of the
Frankists who were disciples of
Jacob Frank (1726–1791) who eventually became an apostate to Judaism by apparently converting to
Catholicism. This era of disappointment did not stem the Jewish masses' yearnings for "mystical" leadership.
[edit] Modern era traditional Kabbalah
Moshe Chaim Luzzatto, leading Italian kabbalist, also wrote secular works, seen by the
Haskalah as the start of modern
Hebrew literature
The
Vilna Gaon, 18th century leader of Rabbinic
opposition to Hasidism, was a Kabbalist who opposed Hasidic doctrinal and practical innovations
Rabbi
Moshe Chaim Luzzatto (1707–1746), based in Italy, was a precocious Talmudic scholar who arrived at the conclusion that there was a need for the public teaching and study of kabbalah. He established a
yeshiva for kabbalah study and actively recruited students and, in addition, wrote copious manuscripts in an appealing clear
Hebrew style, all of which gained the attention of both admirers and rabbinical critics who feared another "Shabbetai Zevi (false messiah) in the making". He was forced to close his school by his rabbinical opponents, hand over and destroy many of his most precious unpublished kabbalistic writings, and go into exile in the Netherlands. He eventually moved to the
Land of Israel. Some of his most important works, such as
Derekh Hashem, survive and are used as a gateway to the world of Jewish mysticism.
Rabbi
Elijah of Vilna (
Vilna Gaon) (1720–1797), based in
Lithuania, had his teachings encoded and publicized by his disciples such as by Rabbi
Chaim Volozhin who published the mystical-ethical work
Nefesh HaChaim. However, he was staunchly opposed to the new Hasidic movement and warned against their public displays of religious fervour inspired by the mystical teachings of their rabbis. Although the Vilna Gaon was not in favor of the Hasidic movement, he did not prohibit the study and engagement in the kabbalah. This is evident from his writings in the
Even Shlema. "He that is able to understand secrets of the Torah and does not try to understand them will be judged harshly, may God have mercy". (The Vilna Gaon, Even Shlema, 8:24). "The Redemption will only come about through learning Torah, and the essence of the Redemption depends upon learning Kabbalah" (The Vilna Gaon, Even Shlema, 11:3).
Among the
Oriental tradition of kabbalah,
Shalom Sharabi (1720–1777) from Yemen was a major esoteric clarifier of the works of the Ari. The
Beit El Synagogue, "yeshivah of the kabbalists", which he came to head, was one of the few communities to bring Lurianic
meditation into communal prayer.
In the 20th century,
Yehuda Ashlag (1885—1954) in Mandate Palestine, was a leading esoteric kabbalist in the traditional mode, who translated the Zohar into Hebrew with a new approach in Lurianic kabbalah.
[edit] Hasidic Judaism
Rabbi
Israel ben Eliezer Baal Shem Tov (1698–1760), founder of Hasidism in the area of the
Ukraine, spread teachings based on Lurianic kabbalah, but adapted to a different aim of immediate psychological perception of
Divine Omnipresence amidst the mundane. The emotional, ecstatic fervour of early Hasidism developed from previous
Nistarim circles of mystical activity, but instead sought communal revival of the common folk by reframing Judaism around the central principle of
devekut (mystical cleaving to God) for all. This new approach turned formerly esoteric elite kabbalistic theory into a popular social mysticism movement for the first time, with its own doctrines, classic texts, teachings and customs. From the Baal Shem Tov sprang the wide ongoing
schools of Hasidic Judaism, each with different approaches and thought. Hasidism instituted a new concept of
Tzadik leadership in Jewish mysticism, where the elite scholars of mystical texts now took on a social role as embodiments and intercessors of Divinity for the masses. With the 19th century consolidation of the movement,
leadership became dynastic. Among later Hasidic schools:
Rebbe
Nachman of Breslov (1772–1810), the great-grandson of the
Baal Shem Tov, revitalized and further expanded the latter's teachings, amassing a following of thousands in
Ukraine,
Belarus,
Lithuania and Poland. In a unique amalgam of Hasidic and
Mitnagid approaches, Rebbe Nachman emphasized study of both kabbalah and serious Torah scholarship to his disciples. His teachings also differed from the way other Hasidic groups were developing, as he rejected the idea of hereditary
Hasidic dynasties and taught that each Hasid must "search for the
tzaddik ('saintly/righteous person')" for himself and within himself.
The
Habad-Lubavitch intellectual school of Hasidism broke away from General-Hasidism's emotional faith orientation, by making the mind central as the route to the internal heart. Its texts combine Jewish
rational investigation with explanation of Kabbalah through articulating unity in a common Divine essence. In recent times, the messianic element latent in Hasidism has come to the fore in Habad.
[edit] 20th century influence
Jewish mysticism has influenced the thought of some major Jewish theologians in the 20th century, outside of Kabbalistic or Hasidic traditions. The first Chief Rabbi of Mandate Palestine,
Abraham Isaac Kook was a mystical thinker who drew heavily on Kabbalistic notions through his own poetic terminology. His writings are concerned with fusing the false divisions between sacred and secular, rational and mystical, legal and imaginative. Students of
Joseph B. Soloveitchik, figurehead of American
Modern Orthodox Judaism have read the influence of Kabbalistic symbols in his
philosophical works.
[32] Neo-Hasidism, rather than Kabbalah, shaped
Martin Buber's philosophy of dialogue and
Abraham Joshua Heschel's
Conservative Judaism.
Lurianic symbols of Tzimtzum and Shevirah have informed
Holocaust theologians.
[33]
[edit] Concepts
[edit] Concealed and Revealed God
The nature of the
Divine prompted kabbalists to envision two aspects to God: (a) God in
essence, absolutely
transcendent, unknowable, limitless
Divine simplicity, and (b) God in manifestation, the revealed persona of God through which He creates and sustains and relates to mankind. Kabbalists speak of the first as
Ein/Ayn Sof (אין סוף "the infinite/endless", literally "that which has no limits"). Of the impersonal Ein Sof nothing can be grasped. The second aspect of Divine
emanations, however, are accessible to human perception, dynamically interacting throughout spiritual and physical existence, reveal the Divine
immanently, and are bound up in the life of man. Kabbalists believe that these two aspects are not contradictory but complement one another, emanations revealing the concealed mystery from within the Godhead.
The
Zohar reads the first words of
Genesis BeReishit Bara Elohim - In the beginning God created as "With the level of "
Reishit-Beginning" the Ein Sof created
Elohim-God's
manifestation in Creation:
"At the very beginning the King made engravings in the supernal purity. A spark of blackness emerged in the sealed within the sealed, from the mystery of the Ayn Sof, a mist within matter, implanted in a ring, no white, no black, no red, no yellow, no colour at all. When He measured with the standard of measure, He made colours to provide light. Within the spark, in the innermost part, emerged a source, from which the colours are painted below; it is sealed among the sealed things of the mystery of Ayn Sof. It penetrated, yet did not penetrate its air. It was not known at all until, from the pressure of its penetration, a single point shone, sealed, supernal. Beyond this point nothing is known, so it is called
reishit (beginning): the first word of all..."
[34]"
The structure of emanations has been characterized in various ways:
Sefirot (Divine attributes) and
Partzufim (Divine "faces"),
Ohr (spiritual light and flow),
Names of God and the supernal Torah,
Olamot (Spiritual Worlds), a Divine Tree and
Archetypal Man, Angelic
Chariot and
Palaces, male and female, enclothed layers of reality, inwardly holy vitality and external
Kelipot shells,
613 channels ("limbs" of the King) and the Divine souls in man. Kabbalists see all aspects as unified through their absolute dependence on their source in the Ein Sof.
[edit] Sefirot and the Divine Feminine
Main articles:
Sephirot and
Shekhinah
Scheme of descending
Sefirot in 3 columns, as a tree with roots above and branches below
The
Sephirot (also spelled "sephiroth") (singular
sefirah) are the ten emanations and attributes of
God with which he continually sustains the universe in existence. The
Zohar and other formative texts elaborate on their emergence from concealment and potential in the infinite
unity of the
Ein Sof.
Cordovero systemises them as one
light poured into ten created
vessels. Comparison of his counting with
Luria's, describes dual rational and unconscious aspects of kabbalah. Two metaphors are used to describe the
sephirot, their
theocentric manifestation as the Trees of
Life and
Knowledge, and their
anthropocentric correspondence in man, exemplified as
Adam Kadmon. This dual-directional perpective embodies the cyclical, inclusive nature of the divine flow, where alternative divine and human perspectives have validity. The central metaphor of man allows human understanding of the sephirot, as they correspond to the psychological faculties of the soul, and incorporate masculine and feminine aspects after Genesis 1:27 ("God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him, male and female He created them"). Corresponding to the last
sefirah in Creation is the
indwelling shekhinah (Feminine Divine Presence). Downward flow of divine
Light in Creation forms the supernal
Four Worlds;
Atziluth,
Beri'ah,
Yetzirah and
Assiah manifesting the dominance of successive sephirot towards action in this world. The acts of man unite or divide the Heavenly masculine and feminine aspects of the sephirot, their
anthropomorphic harmony completing Creation. As the spiritual foundation of Creation, the sephirot correspond to the
names of God in Judaism and the particular nature of any entity.
[edit] Ten Sefirot as process of Creation
According to Lurianic cosmology, the
sefirot correspond to various levels of creation (ten
sefirot in each of the
Four Worlds, and four worlds within each of the larger four worlds, each containing ten
sefirot, which themselves contain ten
sefirot, to an infinite number of possibilities),
[35] and are emanated from the Creator for the purpose of creating the universe. The
sefirot are considered revelations of the Creator's will (
ratzon),
[36] and they should not be understood as ten different "gods" but as ten different ways the one God reveals his will through the Emanations. It is not God who changes but the ability to perceive God that changes.
Altogether, eleven
sefirot are named. However
Keter and
Daat are unconscious and conscious dimensions of one principle, conserving 10 forces. The names of the
sefirot in descending order are:
- Keter (supernal crown, representing above-conscious will)
- Chochmah (the highest potential of thought)
- Binah (the understanding of the potential)
- Daat (intellect of knowledge)
- Chesed (sometimes referred to as Gedolah-greatness) (loving-kindness)
- Gevurah (sometimes referred to as Din-justice or Pachad-fear) (severity/strength)
- Rachamim also known as Tiphereth (mercy)
- Netzach (victory/eternity)
- Hod (glory/splendour)
- Yesod (foundation)
- Malkuth (kingdom)
[edit] Ten Sefirot as process of ethics
Divine creation by means of the Ten Sefirot is an ethical process. They represent the different aspects of Morality. Loving-Kindness is a possible moral justification found in Chessed, and Gevurah is the Moral Justification of Justice and both are mediated by Mercy which is Rachamim. However, these pillars of morality become immoral once they become extremes. When Loving-Kindness become extreme it can lead to sexual depravity and lack of Justice to the wicked. When Justice becomes extreme, it can lead to torture and the Murder of innocents and unfair punishment.
"Righteous" humans (
tzadikim) ascend these ethical qualities of the ten
sefirot by doing righteous actions. If there were no righteous humans, the blessings of God would become completely hidden, and creation would cease to exist. While real human actions are the "Foundation" (
Yesod) of this universe (
Malchut), these actions must accompany the conscious intention of compassion. Compassionate actions are often impossible without faith (
Emunah), meaning to trust that God always supports compassionate actions even when God seems hidden. Ultimately, it is necessary to show compassion toward oneself too in order to share compassion toward others. This "selfish" enjoyment of God's blessings but only in order to empower oneself to assist others is an important aspect of "Restriction", and is considered a kind of
golden mean in kabbalah, corresponding to the
sefirah of Adornment (
Tiferet) being part of the "Middle Column".
Moses ben Jacob Cordovero, wrote
Tomer Devorah (
Palm Tree of Deborah), he presents an ethical teaching of Judaism in the kabbalistic context of the ten
sefirot.
Tomer Devorah has become also a foundational
Musar text.
[37]
[edit] Descending spiritual Worlds
Main article:
Four Worlds
Medieval Kabbalists believed that all things are linked to God through these emanations, making all levels in creation part of one great, gradually descending
chain of being. Through this any lower creation reflects its particular characteristics in Supernal Divinity.
Hasidic thought extends the
Divine immanence of Kabbalah by holding that God is all that really exists, all else being completely undifferentiated from God's perspective. This view can be defined as
monistic panentheism. According to this philosophy, God's existence is higher than anything that this world can express, yet he includes all things of this world within his Divine reality in perfect unity, so that the Creation effected no change in him at all. This paradox is dealt with at length in
Chabad texts.
[38]
[edit] Origin of evil
Amulet from the 1400s. Theosophical kabbalists, especially Luria, censored contemporary
Practical Kabbalah, but allowed amulets by Sages
[39]
Among problems considered in the Hebrew Kabbalah is the universal religious issue of the nature and origin of evil. In the views of some Kabbalists this conceives 'evil' as a 'quality of God', asserting that negativity enters into the essence of the Absolute. In this view it is conceived that the Absolute needs evil to 'be what it is', i.e., to exist.
[40]
[edit] Role of Man
Joseph Karo's role as both legalist and mystic underscores Kabbalah's spiritualisation of normative Jewish observance
Kabbalistic doctrine gives man the central role in Creation, as his soul and body correspond to the supernal divine manifestations. In the
Christian Kabbalah this scheme was
universalised to describe
harmino mundi, the harmony of Creation within man.
[41] In
Judaism, it gave a profound spiritualisation of
Jewish practice. While the kabbalistic scheme gave a radically innovative, though conceptually continuous, development of mainstream
Midrashic and
Talmudic Rabbinic notions, kabbalistic thought underscored and invigorated conservative Jewish observance. The esoteric teachings of kabbalah gave the traditional
mitzvot observances the central role in spiritual creation, whether the practitioner was learned in this knowledge or not. Accompanying normative Jewish observance and worship with elite mystical
kavanot intentions gave them
theurgic power, but sincere observance by common folk, especially in the
Hasidic popularisation of kabbalah, could replace esoteric abilities. Many kabbalists were also leading legal figures in Judaism, such as
Nachmanides and
Joseph Karo.
Medieval kabbalah elaborates particular reasons for each Biblical
mitzvah, and their role in harmonising the supernal divine flow,
uniting masculine and feminine forces on High. With this, the feminine
Divine presence in this world is drawn from exile to the
Holy One Above. The
613 mitzvot are embodied in the organs and soul of man.
Lurianic kabbalah incorporates this in the more inclusive scheme of
Jewish messianic rectification of exiled divinity. Jewish mysticism, in contrast to
Divine-transcendent rationalist human-centred reasons for Jewish observance, gave
Divine-immanent providential cosmic significance to the daily events in the worldly life of man in general, and the spiritual role of Jewish observance in particular.
[edit] Human soul
Building on Kabbalah's conception of the soul,
Abraham Abulafia's meditations included the "inner illumination of" the human form
[42]
The Kabbalah posits that the human soul has three elements, the
nefesh,
ru'ach, and
neshamah. The
nefesh is found in all humans, and enters the physical body at birth. It is the source of one's physical and psychological nature. The next two parts of the soul are not implanted at birth, but can be developed over time; their development depends on the actions and beliefs of the individual. They are said to only fully exist in people awakened spiritually. A common way of explaining the three parts of the soul is as follows:
- Nefesh (נפש): the lower part, or "animal part", of the soul. It is linked to instincts and bodily cravings. This part of the soul is provided at birth.
- Ruach (רוח): the middle soul, the "spirit". It contains the moral virtues and the ability to distinguish between good and evil.
- Neshamah (נשמה): the higher soul, or "super-soul". This separates man from all other life-forms. It is related to the intellect and allows man to enjoy and benefit from the afterlife. It allows one to have some awareness of the existence and presence of God.
The
Raaya Meheimna, a section of related teachings spread throughout the
Zohar, discusses fourth and fifth parts of the human soul, the
chayyah and
yehidah (first mentioned in the Midrash Rabbah).
Gershom Scholem writes that these "were considered to represent the sublimest levels of intuitive cognition, and to be within the grasp of only a few chosen individuals". The Chayyah and the Yechidah do not enter into the body like the other three—thus they received less attention in other sections of the
Zohar.
- Chayyah (חיה): The part of the soul that allows one to have an awareness of the divine life force itself.
- Yehidah (יחידה): The highest plane of the soul, in which one can achieve as full a union with God as is possible.
Both rabbinic and kabbalistic works posit that there are a few additional, non-permanent states of the soul that people can develop on certain occasions. These extra souls, or extra states of the soul, play no part in any afterlife scheme, but are mentioned for completeness:
- Ruach HaKodesh (רוח הקודש) ("spirit of holiness"): a state of the soul that makes prophecy possible. Since the age of classical prophecy passed, no one (outside of Israel) receives the soul of prophecy any longer. See the teachings of Abraham Abulafia for differing views of this matter.
- Neshamah Yeseira: The "supplemental soul" that a Jew can experience on Shabbat. It makes possible an enhanced spiritual enjoyment of the day. This exists only when one is observing Shabbat; it can be lost and gained depending on one's observance.
- Neshamah Kedosha: Provided to Jews at the age of maturity (13 for boys, 12 for girls), and is related to the study and fulfillment of the Torah commandments. It exists only when one studies and follows Torah; it can be lost and gained depending on one's study and observance.
[edit] Tzimtzum, Shevirah and Tikun
16th century graves of
Safed, Galilee. The messianic focus of its mystical renaissance culminated in
Lurianic thought
After publication of the
Zohar in the late 13th century, attempts were made to interpret and systemise the doctrines within its imagery. This culminated in the successive, comprehensive expositions of
Cordovero and
Luria in 16th century
Safed. While Cordovero systemised Medieval kabbalah in a
rationally influenced linear scheme, this was subsequently superseded by the mythological, dynamic scheme of Isaac Luria, recorded by
Chaim Vital and his other disciples. Lurianic theosophy became the foundation of modern kabbalah, incorporating Medieval theosophy within its wider explanation. The supra-rational
Lurianic doctrines of
Tzimtzum,
Shevirah and
Tikun reorganised Kabbalistic doctrine around crisis-catharsis Divine exile and redemption, explaining
Jewish messianism in Kabbalah.
Tzimtzum (Constriction/Concentration) is the primordial cosmic act whereby God "contracted" His infinite light, leaving a "void" into which the light of existence was poured. This allowed the emergence of independent existence that would not become nullified by the pristine
Infinite Light, reconciling the unity of the
Ein Sof with the plurality of creation. This changed the first creative act into one of withdrawal/exile, the antithesis of the ultimate Divine Will. In contrast, a new emanation after the Tzimtzum shone into the vacuum to begin creation, but led to an initial instability called
Tohu (Chaos), leading to a new crisis of
Shevirah (Shattering) of the sephirot vessels. The shards of the broken vessels fell down into the lower realms, animated by remnants of their divine light, causing primordial exile within the Divine Persona before the creation of man. Exile and enclothement of higher divinity within lower realms throughout existence requires man to complete the
Tikkun olam (Rectification) process. Rectification Above corresponds to the reorganization of the independent sefirot into relating
Partzufim (Divine Personas), previously referred to obliquely in the Zohar. From the catastrophe stems the possibility of self-aware Creation, and also the
Kelipot (Impure Shells) of previous Medieval kabbalah. The metaphorical
anthropomorphism of the partzufim accenuates the sexual unifications of the redemption process, while
Gilgul reincarnation emerges from the scheme. Uniquely, Lurianism gave formerly private mysticism the urgency of Messianic social involvement.
According to interpretations of Luria, the catastrophe stemmed from the "unwillingness" of the residue imprint after the Tzimtzum to relate to the new vitality that began creation. The process was arranged to shed and harmonise the Divine Infinity with the latent potential of evil.
[43] The creation of
Adam would have redeemed existence, but his sin caused new shevirah of Divine vitality, requiring the
Giving of the Torah to begin Messianic rectification. Historical and individual history becomes the narrative of reclaiming exiled Divine sparks.
[edit] Linguistic mysticism of Hebrew
Kabbalistic thought extended
Biblical and
Midrashic notions that God enacted Creation through the Hebrew language and through the Torah into a full linguistic mysticism. In this, every
Hebrew letter, word, number, even accent on words of the
Hebrew Bible contain esoteric meanings, describing the spiritual dimensions within exoteric ideas, and it teaches the
hermeneutic methods of interpretation for ascertaining these meanings.
Names of God in Judaism have further prominence, though fluidity of meaning turns the whole Torah into a Divine name. As the Hebrew name of things is the channel of their lifeforce, parallel to the sephirot, so concepts such as "holiness" and "
mitzvot" embody
ontological Divine immanence, as God can be known in manifestation as well as
transcendence. The infinite potential of meaning in the Torah, as in the
Ein Sof, is reflected in the symbol of the two trees of the
Garden of Eden; the Torah of the
Tree of Knowledge is the external,
Halachic Torah, through which mystics can perceive the unlimited Torah of the
Tree of Life. In Lurianic expression, each of the 600,000 souls of Israel find their own interpretation in Torah.
"The reapers of the Field are the Comrades, masters of this wisdom, because
Malkhut is called the Apple Field, and She grows sprouts of secrets and new meanings of Torah. Those who constantly create new interpretations of Torah are the ones who reap Her."
[44]
As early as the 1st century BCE Jews believed that the
Torah (first five books of the Hebrew Bible) and wider canonical texts contained
encoded messages and hidden meanings.
Gematria is one method for discovering its hidden meanings. Each letter in Hebrew also represents a number; Hebrew, unlike many other languages, never developed a separate numerical alphabet. By converting letters to numbers, Kabbalists were able to find a hidden meaning in each word. This method of interpretation was used extensively by various schools.
[edit] Primary texts
Title page of first printed edition of the
Zohar, main sourcebook of Kabbalah, from
Mantua, Italy in 1558
Like the rest of the Rabbinic literature, the texts of kabbalah were once part of an ongoing
oral tradition, though, over the centuries, much of the oral tradition has been written down.
Jewish forms of
esotericism existed over 2,000 years ago.
Ben Sira (born c. 170 BCE) warns against it, saying: "You shall have no business with secret things".
[45] Nonetheless, mystical studies were undertaken and resulted in mystical literature, the first being the
Apocalyptic literature of the second and first pre-Christian centuries and which contained elements that carried over to later kabbalah.
Throughout the centuries since, many texts have been produced, among them the ancient descriptions of
Sefer Yetzirah, the
Heichalot mystical ascent literature, the
Bahir,
Sefer Raziel HaMalakh and the
Zohar, the main text of Kabbalistic exegesis. Classic mystical
Bible commentaries are included in fuller versions of the
Mikraot Gedolot (Main Commentators). Cordoveran systemisation is presented in
Pardes Rimonim, philosophical articulation in the works of the
Maharal, and Lurianic rectification in
Etz Chayim. Subsequent interpretation of Lurianic Kabbalah was made in the writings of
Shalom Sharabi, in
Nefesh HaChaim and the 20th-century
Sulam. Hasidism interpreted kabbalistic structures to their correspondence in inward perception.
[46] The
Hasidic development of kabbalah incorporates a successive stage of Jewish mysticism from historical kabbalistic metaphysics.
[47]
[edit] Scholarship
The first modern-academic historians of Judaism, the "
Wissenschaft des Judentums" school of the 19th century, framed Judaism in solely
rational terms in the
emancipatory Haskalah spirit of their age. They opposed kabbalah and restricted its significance from Jewish
historiography. In the mid-20th century, it was left to
Gershom Scholem to overturn their stance, establishing the flourishing present-day academic investigation of Jewish mysticism, and making Heichalot, Kabbalistic and Hasidic texts the objects of scholarly critical-historical study. In Scholem's opinion, the mythical and mystical components of Judaism were at least as important as the rational ones, and he thought that they, rather than the exoteric
Halakha, were the living current in historical Jewish development.
The
Hebrew University of Jerusalem has been a centre of this research, including Scholem and
Isaiah Tishby, and more recently
Joseph Dan,
Yehuda Liebes,
Rachel Elior, and
Moshe Idel.
[48] Scholars across the eras of Jewish mysticism in America and Britain have included
Arthur Green,
Lawrence Fine,
Elliot Wolfson,
Daniel Matt[49] and
Ada Rapoport-Albert.
Scholars in the present generation have revised early theories including Scholem's, on such questions as Heichalot mysticism and a Jewish "
gnosticism", the origins of Kabbalah, and the sources of Hasidism.
[citation needed] Moshe Idel has opened up research on the
Ecstatic Kabbalah alongside the theosophical, and has called for new multi-disciplinary approaches, beyond the
philological and
historical that have dominated until now, to include
phenomenology,
psychology,
anthropology and
comparative studies.
[50]
[edit] Claims for authority
Historians have noted that most claims for the authority of kabbalah involve an argument of the antiquity of authority (see, e.g., Joseph Dan's discussion in his
Circle of the Unique Cherub). As a result, virtually all early foundational works
pseudepigraphically claim, or are ascribed, ancient authorship. For example,
Sefer Raziel HaMalach, an
astro-magical text partly based on a magical manual of late antiquity,
Sefer ha-Razim, was, according to the kabbalists, transmitted by the angel
Raziel to Adam after he was evicted from
Eden.
Another famous work, the early
Sefer Yetzirah, supposedly dates back to the patriarch
Abraham. This tendency toward pseudepigraphy has its roots in
apocalyptic literature, which claims that esoteric knowledge such as
magic,
divination and
astrology was transmitted to humans in the mythic past by the two angels, Aza and
Azaz'el (in other places, Azaz'el and Uzaz'el) who fell from heaven (see Genesis 6:4).
[edit] Criticism
[edit] Dualistic cosmology
Although Kabbalah propounds the Unity of God, one of the most serious and sustained criticisms is that it may lead away from
monotheism, and instead promote
dualism, the belief that there is a supernatural counterpart to God. The dualistic system holds that there is a good power versus an evil power. There are two primary models of Gnostic-dualistic cosmology: the first, which goes back to
Zoroastrianism, believes creation is ontologically divided between good and evil forces; the second, found largely in Greco-Roman
metaphysics like
Neo-Platonism, argues that the universe knew a primordial harmony, but that a cosmic disruption yielded a second, evil, dimension to reality. This second model influenced the cosmology of the Kabbalah.
According to Kabbalistic cosmology, the Ten Sefirot correspond to ten levels of creation. These levels of creation must not be understood as ten different "gods" but as ten different ways of revealing God, one per level. It is not God who changes but the ability to perceive God that changes.
While God may seem to exhibit dual natures (masculine-feminine, compassionate-judgmental, creator-creation), all adherents of Kabbalah have consistently stressed the ultimate unity of God. For example, in all discussions of Male and Female, the hidden nature of God exists above it all without limit, being called the Infinite or the "No End" (
Ein Sof)—neither one nor the other, transcending any definition. The ability of God to become hidden from perception is called "Restriction" (
Tzimtzum). Hiddenness makes creation possible because God can become "revealed" in a diversity of limited ways, which then form the building blocks of creation.
Kabbalistic texts, including the
Zohar, appear to affirm dualism, as they ascribe all evil to the separation from holiness known as the Sitra Achra
[51] ("the other side") which is opposed to
Sitra D’Kedushah, or the Side of Holiness.
[52] The "left side" of divine emanation is a negative mirror image of the "side of holiness" with which it was locked in combat. [
Encyclopaedia Judaica, Volume 6, "Dualism", p. 244]. While this evil aspect exists within the divine structure of the Sefirot, the
Zohar indicates that the Sitra Ahra has no power over Ein Sof, and only exists as a necessary aspect of the creation of God to give man free choice, and that evil is the consequence of this choice. It is not a supernatural force opposed to God, but a reflection of the inner moral combat within mankind between the dictates of morality and the surrender to one's basic instincts.
Rabbi Dr. David Gottlieb notes that many Kabbalists hold that the concepts of, e.g., a Heavenly Court or the Sitra Ahra are only given to humanity by God as a working model to understand His ways within our own
epistemological limits. They reject the notion that a
satan or
angels actually exist. Others hold that non-divine spiritual entities were indeed created by God as a means for exacting his will.
According to Kabbalists, humans cannot yet understand the infinity of God. Rather, there is God as revealed to humans (corresponding to
Zeir Anpin), and the rest of the infinity of God as remaining hidden from human experience (corresponding to Arich Anpin).
[53] One reading of this theology is monotheistic, similar to
panentheism; another reading of the same theology is that it is dualistic.
Gershom Scholem writes:
It is clear that with this postulate of an impersonal basic reality in God, which becomes a person—or appears as a person—only in the process of Creation and Revelation, Kabbalism abandons the personalistic basis of the Biblical conception of God....It will not surprise us to find that speculation has run the whole gamut—from attempts to re-transform the impersonal En-Sof into the personal God of the Bible to the downright heretical doctrine of a genuine dualism between the hidden Ein Sof and the personal Demiurge of Scripture.
—Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism Shocken Books (p.11–12)
[edit] Distinction between Jews and non-Jews
A number of medieval Kabbalistic sources contain statements to the effect that the Jewish soul is ontologically different from the soul of non-Jews; for example, it is held by some that Jews have three levels of soul,
nefesh,
ruach and
neshamah while non-Jews have only
nefesh. The Zohar comments on the Biblical verse which states "Let the waters teem with swarms of creatures that have a living soul" as follows: "The verse 'creatures that have a living soul,' pertains to the Jews, for they are the children of God, and from God come their holy souls....And the souls of the other nations, from where do they come? Rabbi Elazar says that they have souls from the impure left side, and therefore they are all impure, defiling anyone who comes near them" (Zohar commentary on Genesis).
Such theologically framed hostility may have been a response to some medieval demonization of Jews which developed in some parts of Western and Christian society and thought, starting with the Patristic writings.
[54] According to
Isaac Luria (1534–72) and other commentators on the
Zohar,
righteous Gentiles do not have this demonic aspect and are in many ways similar to Jewish souls. A number of prominent Kabbalists, e.g. Rabbi Pinchas Eliyahu of Vilna, the author of
Sefer ha-Brit, held that only some marginal elements in the humanity represent these demonic forces. On the other hand, the souls of Jewish heretics have much more satanic energy than the worst of
idol worshippers; this view is popular in some Hasidic circles, especially
Satmar Hasidim.
Some later Kabbalistic works build and elaborate on these ideas. One point of view is represented by the Hasidic work
Tanya (1797), in order to argue that Jews have a different character of soul: while a non-Jew, according to the author Rabbi
Shneur Zalman of Liadi (b. 1745), can achieve a high level of spiritually, similar to an angel, his soul is still fundamentally different in character, but not value, from a Jewish one.
[55] A similar view is found in early medieval philosophical book
Kuzari, by
Yehuda Halevi (1075-1141 AD).
On the other hand, many prominent Kabbalists rejected this idea and believed in essential equality of all human souls.
Menahem Azariah da Fano (1548–1620), in his book
Reincarnations of souls, provides many examples of non-Jewish Biblical figures being reincarnated into Jews and vice versa; the contemporary
Habad Rabbi and mystic
Dov Ber Pinson teaches that distinctions between Jews and non-Jews in works such as the
Tanya are not to be understood as literally referring to the external properties of a person (what religious community they are born into), but rather as referring to the properties of souls as they can be re-incarnated in any religious community.
[56]
Another prominent Habad Rabbi,
Abraham Yehudah Khein (b. 1878), believed that spiritually elevated Gentiles have essentially Jewish souls, "who just lack the formal conversion to Judaism", and that unspiritual Jews are "Jewish merely by their birth documents".
[57] The great 20th-century Kabbalist
Yehuda Ashlag viewed the terms "Jews" and "Gentile" as different levels of perception, available to every human soul.
David Halperin
[58] argues that the collapse of Kabbalah's influence among Western European Jews over the course of the 17th and 18th century was a result of the cognitive dissonance they experienced between the negative perception of Gentiles found in some exponents of Kabbalah, and their own positive dealings with non-Jews, which were rapidly expanding and improving during this period due to the influence of the Enlightenment.
However, a number of renowned Kabbalists claimed the exact opposite. In their view, Kabbalah transcends the borders of Judaism and can serve as a basis of inter-religious theosophy and a universal religion. Rabbi
Pinchas Elijah Hurwitz, a prominent Lithuanian-Galician Kabbalist of the 18th century and a moderate proponent of the
Haskalah, called for brotherly love and solidarity between all nations, and believed that Kabbalah can empower everyone, Jews and Gentiles alike, with prophetic abilities.
[59]
The works of
Abraham Cohen de Herrera (1570–1635) are full of references to Gentile mystical philosophers. Such approach was particularly common among the
Renaissance and post-Renaissance
Italian Jews. Late medieval and Renaissance Italian Kabbalists, such as
Yohanan Alemanno,
David Messer Leon and
Abraham Yagel, adhered to
humanistic ideals and incorporated teachings of various
Christian and
pagan mystics.
A prime representative of this humanist stream in Kabbalah was Rabbi
Elijah Benamozegh, who explicitly praised Christianity, Islam, Zoroastrianism, Hinduism, as well as a whole range of ancient pagan mystical systems. He believed that Kabbalah can reconcile the differences between the world religions, which represent different facets and stages of the universal human spirituality. In his writings, Benamozegh interprets the
New Testament,
Hadith,
Vedas,
Avesta and
pagan mysteries according to the Kabbalistic
theosophy.
[60]
For a different perspective, see Wolfson.
[61] He provides numerous examples from the 17th to the 20th centuries, which would challenge the view of Halperin cited above as well as the notion that "modern Judaism" has rejected or dismissed this "outdated aspect" of the religion and, he argues, there are still Kabbalists today who harbor this view. He argues that, while it is accurate to say that many Jews do and would find this distinction offensive, it is inaccurate to say that the idea has been totally rejected in all circles. As Wolfson has argued, it is an ethical demand on the part of scholars to continue to be vigilant with regard to this matter and in this way the tradition can be refined from within.
However, as explained above, many well known Kabbalists rejected the literal interpretation of these seemingly discriminatory views. They argued that the term "Jew" was to be interpreted metaphorically, as referring to the spiritual development of the soul, rather than the superficial denomination of the individual, and they added a chain of intermediary states between "Jews" and idol worshippers, or spiritualized the very definition of "Jews" and "non-Jews" and argued that a soul can be re-incarnated in different communities (whether Jewish or not) as much as within a single one.
[56]
[edit] Medieval views
The idea that there are ten divine
sefirot could evolve over time into the idea that "God is One being, yet in that One being there are Ten" which opens up a debate about what the "correct beliefs" in God should be, according to Judaism.
Rabbi
Saadia Gaon teaches in his book
Emunot v'Deot that Jews who believe in
reincarnation have adopted a non-Jewish belief.
Maimonides (12th century) rejected many of the texts of the
Hekalot, particularly
Shi'ur Qomah whose starkly anthropomorphic vision of God he considered heretical.
Nachmanides (13th century) provides background to many Kabbalistic ideas. His works,
Torah, offer in-depth of various concepts. In fact, an entire book, entitled
Gevuras Aryeh, was authored by Rabbi
Yaakov Yehuda Aryeh Leib Frenkel and originally published in 1915, specifically to explain and elaborate on the Kabbalistic concepts addressed by
Nachmanides in his commentary to the Five books of Moses
Rabbi
Abraham ben Moses ben Maimon, in the spirit of his father Maimonides, Rabbi
Saadiah Gaon, and other predecessors, explains at length in his book
Milhhamot HaShem that the Almighty is in no way literally within time or space nor physically outside time or space, since time and space simply do not apply to His Being whatsoever. This is in contrast to certain popular understandings of modern Kabbalah which teach a form of
panentheism, that His 'essence' is within everything.
Around the 1230s,
Rabbi Meir ben Simon of Narbonne wrote an epistle (included in his
Milhhemet Mitzvah) against his contemporaries, the early Kabbalists, characterizing them as blasphemers who even approach heresy. He particularly singled out the
Sefer Bahir, rejecting the attribution of its authorship to the
tanna R. Nehhunya ben ha-Kanah and describing some of its content as truly heretical.
Rabbi Yitzchak ben Sheshet Perfet (The
Rivash), 1326–1408. Although as is evident from his response on the topic (157) the Rivash was skeptical of certain interpretations of Kabbalah popular in his time, it is equally evident that overall he did accept Kabbalah as received Jewish wisdom, and attempted to defend it from attackers. To this end he cited and rejected a certain philosopher who claimed that Kabbalah was "worse than Christianity", as it made God into 10, not just into three. Most followers of Kabbalah have never followed this interpretation of Kabbalah, on the grounds that the concept of the Christian Trinity posits that there are three persons existing within the Godhead, one of whom became a human being.
[citation needed] In contrast, the mainstream understanding of the Kabbalistic
Sefirot holds that they have no mind or intelligence; further, they are not addressed in prayer and they cannot become a human being. They are conduits for interaction, not persons or beings. Nonetheless, many important
poskim, such as Maimonidies in his work
Mishneh Torah, prohibit any use of mediators between oneself and the Creator as a form of idolatry.
Rabbi
Leone di Modena, a 17th-century
Venetian critic of Kabbalah, wrote that if we were to accept the Kabbalah, then the Christian trinity would indeed be compatible with Judaism, as the Trinity closely resembles the Kabbalistic doctrine of the
Sefirot. This critique was in response to the knowledge that some European Jews of the period addressed individual
Sefirot in some of their prayers, although the practise was apparently uncommon. Apologists explain that Jews may have been praying
for and not necessarily
to the aspects of Godliness represented by the
Sefirot.
Yaakov Emden, 1697–1776, wrote the book
Mitpahhath Sfarim (
Veil of the Books), a detailed critique of the
Zohar in which he concludes that certain parts of the Zohar contain heretical teaching and therefore could not have been written by
Shimon bar Yochai.
[edit] Orthodox Judaism
Yihhyah Qafahh, an early-20th-century
Yemenite Jewish leader and grandfather of
Yosef Qafih, also wrote a book entitled
Milhamoth ha-Shem (
Wars of the Name) against what he perceived as the false teachings of the Zohar and the false Kabbalah of
Isaac Luria. He is credited with spearheading the
Dor Daim who continue in Yihhyah Qafahh's view of Kabbalah into modern times.
Yeshayahu Leibowitz 1903–1994, brother of
Nechama Leibowitz, though
Modern Orthodox in his world view, publicly shared the views expressed in R. Yihhyah Qafahh's book
Milhhamoth HaShem and elaborated upon these views in his many writings.
There is dispute among modern
Haredim as to the status of
Isaac Luria's, the
Arizal's Kabbalistic teachings. While a portion of
Modern Orthodox Rabbis,
Dor Daim and many students of the
Rambam, completely reject Arizal's Kabbalistic teachings, as well as deny that the
Zohar is authoritative, or from
Shimon bar Yohai, all three of these groups completely accept the existence and validity of
Ma'aseh Merkavah and
Ma'aseh B'resheet mysticism. Their only disagreement concerns whether the Kabbalistic teachings promulgated today are accurate representations of those esoteric teachings to which the Talmud refers. Within the Haredi Jewish community one can find both rabbis who sympathize with such a view,
[citation needed] while not necessarily agreeing with it, as well as rabbis who consider such a view absolute heresy.
[edit] Conservative, Reform and Reconstructionist Judaism
Kabbalah tended to be rejected by most Jews in the
Conservative and
Reform movements, though its influences were not completely eliminated. While it was generally not studied as a discipline, the Kabbalistic
Kabbalat Shabbat service remained part of liberal liturgy, as did the
Yedid Nefesh prayer. Nevertheless, in the 1960s, Rabbi
Saul Lieberman of the
Jewish Theological Seminary of America is reputed to have introduced a lecture by Scholem on Kabbalah with a statement that Kabbalah itself was "nonsense", but the academic study of Kabbalah was "scholarship". This view became popular among many Jews, who viewed the subject as worthy of study, but who did not accept Kabbalah as teaching literal truths.
According to Rabbi
Bradley Shavit Artson (Dean of the Conservative
Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies in the
American Jewish University)
Many western Jews insisted that their future and their freedom required shedding what they perceived as parochial orientalism. They fashioned a Judaism that was decorous and strictly rational (according to 19th-century European standards), denigrating Kabbalah as backward, superstitious, and marginal.[62]
However, in the late 20th century and early 21st century there has been a revival in interest in Kabbalah in all branches of liberal Judaism. The Kabbalistic 12th-century prayer
Anim Zemirot was restored to the new Conservative
Sim Shalom siddur, as was the
B'rikh Shmeh passage from the
Zohar, and the mystical
Ushpizin service welcoming to the
Sukkah the spirits of Jewish forbearers.
Anim Zemirot and the 16th-century mystical poem
Lekhah Dodi reappeared in the Reform Siddur
Gates of Prayer in 1975. All Rabbinical seminaries now teach several courses in Kabbalah—in Conservative Judaism, both the Jewish Theological Seminary and the Ziegler School of Rabbinical Studies of the University of Judaism in Los Angeles have full-time instructors in Kabbalah and
Hasidut, Eitan Fishbane and Pinchas Geller, respectively. In the Reform movement Sharon Koren teaches at the Hebrew Union College. Reform Rabbis like Herbert Weiner and
Lawrence Kushner have renewed interest in Kabbalah among Reform Jews. At the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College, the only accredited seminary that has curricular requirements in Kabbalah, Joel Hecker is the full-time instructor teaching courses in Kabbalah and Hasidut.
According to Artson:
Ours is an age hungry for meaning, for a sense of belonging, for holiness. In that search, we have returned to the very Kabbalah our predecessors scorned. The stone that the builders rejected has become the head cornerstone (Psalm 118:22)... Kabbalah was the last universal theology adopted by the entire Jewish people, hence faithfulness to our commitment to positive-historical Judaism mandates a reverent receptivity to Kabbalah.[19]
The
Reconstructionist movement, under the leadership of Arthur Green in the 1980s and 1990s, and with the influence of Zalman Schachter Shalomi, brought a strong openness to Kabbalah and hasidic elements that then came to play prominent roles in the Kol ha-Neshamah siddur series.
[edit] Contemporary study
The Kabbalah Tree (1985), oil on canvas by the Italian artist Davide Tonato
Teaching of classic esoteric kabbalah texts and practice remained traditional until recent times, passed on in Judaism from master to disciple, or studied by leading rabbinic scholars. This changed in the 20th century, through conscious reform and the secular openness of knowledge. In contemporary times kabbalah is studied in four very different, though sometimes overlapping, ways:
- The traditional method, employed among Jews since the 16th century, continues in learned study circles. Its prerequisite is to either be born Jewish or be a convert and to join a group of kabbalists under the tutelage of a rabbi, since the 18th century more likely a Hasidic one, though others exist among Sephardi-Mizrachi, and Lithuanian Rabbinic scholars. Beyond elite, historical esoteric kabbalah, the public-communally studied texts of Hasidic thought explain kabbalistic concepts for wide spiritual application, through their own concern with popular psychological perception of Divine Panentheism. In recent times, many Orthodox Jewish outreach organisations for secular Jews teach Kabbalistic and Hasidic texts.
- A second, new universalist form, is the method of modern-style Jewish organisations and writers, who seek to disseminate kabbalah to every man, woman and child regardless of race or class, especially since the Western interest in mysticism from the 1960s. These derive from various cross-denominational Jewish interests in kabbalah, and range from considered theology to popularised forms that often adopt New Age terminology and beliefs for wider communication. These groups hilight or interpret kabbalah through non-particularist, universalist aspects.
- A third way are non-Jewish organisations, mystery schools, initiation bodies, fraternities and secret societies, the most popular of which are Freemasonry, Rosicrucianism and the Golden Dawn, although hundreds of similar societies claim a kabbalistic lineage. These derive from syncretic combinations of Jewish kabbalah with Christian, occultist or contemporary New Age spirituality. As a separate spiritual tradition in Western esotericism since the Renaissance, with different aims from its Jewish origin, the non-Jewish traditions differ significantly and do not give an accurate representation of the Jewish spiritual understanding (or vice-versa).[63]
- Fourthly, since the mid-20th century, historical-critical scholarly investigation of all eras of Jewish mysticism has flourished into an established department of university Jewish studies. Where the first academic historians of Judaism in the 19th century opposed and marginalised kabbalah, Gershom Scholem and his successors repositioned the historiography of Jewish mysticism as a central, vital component of Judaic renewal through history. Cross-disciplinary academic revisions of Scholem's and others' theories are regularly published for wide readership.
[edit] Universalist Jewish organisations
The two, unrelated organisations that translate the mid-20th century teachings of Rabbi
Yehuda Ashlag into a contemporary universalist message, have given kabbalah a public cross-religious profile:
- Bnei Baruch is a group of Kabbalah students, based in Israel. Study materials are available in over 25 languages for free online or at printing cost. Michael Laitman established Bnei Baruch in 1991, following the passing of his teacher, Rabbi Ashlag's son Rav Baruch Ashlag. Laitman named his group Bnei Baruch (sons of Baruch) to commemorate the memory of his mentor. The teaching strongly suggests restricting one's studies to 'authentic sources', kabbalists of the direct lineage of master to disciple.[64][65]
- The Kabbalah Centre was founded in the United States in 1965 as The National Research Institute of Kabbalah by Philip Berg and Rav Yehuda Tzvi Brandwein, disciple of Rabbi Yehuda Ashlag's. Later Philip Berg and his wife re-established the organisation as the worldwide Kabbalah Centre.[66] In recent times its outreach teaching in New Age style has attracted a cross-religious celebrity following and media profile, though the organisation is led by Orthodox Jewish teachers.
Other prominent Jewish universalist organisations:
- The Kabbalah Society, run by Warren Kenton, an organisation based instead on pre-Lurianic Medieval Kabbalah presented in universalist New Age syncretic style. In contrast, traditional kabbalists read earlier kabbalah through later Lurianism and the systemisations of 16th-century Safed.
- The New Kabbalah, website and books by Sanford L. Drob, is a scholarly intellectual investigation of the Lurianic symbolism in the perspective of modern and postmodern intellectual thought. It seeks a "new kabbalah" rooted in the historical tradition through its academic study, but universalised through dialogue with modern philosophy and psychology. This approach seeks to enrich the secular disciplines, while uncovering intellectual insights formerly implicit in kabbalah's essential myth:[67]
"By being equipped with the nonlinear concepts of
dialectical,
psychoanalytic, and
deconstructive thought we can begin to make sense of the kabbalistic symbols in our own time. So equipped, we are today probably in a better position to understand the
philosophical aspects of the kabbalah than were the kabbalists themselves."
[68]
[edit] Neo-Hasidic
From the early 20th century,
Neo-Hasidism expressed a non-Orthodox Jewish interest in Jewish mysticism, becoming organisational among Conservative, Reform and Reconstructionalist
Jewish denominations from the 1960s, through
Jewish Renewal and the
Chavurah movement. The writings and teachings of
Zalman Schachter-Shalomi,
Arthur Green,
Lawrence Kushner,
Herbert Weiner and others, has sought a Kabbalistic and Hasidic study and spirituality among modernist Jews.
[edit] Hasidic
Since the 18th century, Jewish mystical development has continued in
Hasidic Judaism, turning kabbalah into a social revival with texts that internalise mystical thought. Among
different schools,
Chabad-Lubavitch and
Breslav with related organisations, give outward looking spiritual resources and textual learning for secular Jews. The Intellectual Hasidism of Chabad most emphasises the spread and understanding of kabbalah through its explanation in
Hasidic thought, articulating the Divine meaning within kabbalah through human rational analogies, uniting the spiritual and material, esoteric and exoteric in their Divine source:
"Hasidic thought instructs in the predominance of spiritual form over physical matter, the advantage of matter when it is purified, and the advantage of form when integrated with matter. The two are to be unified so one cannot detect where either begins or ends, for 'the Divine beginning is implanted in the end and the end in the beginning' (Sefer Yetzira 1:7). The One God created both for one purpose - to reveal the holy light of His hidden power. Only both united complete the perfection desired by the Creator."
[69]
[edit] Rav Kook
The writings of
Abraham Isaac Kook (1864–1935), first Chief Rabbi of Mandate Palestine and visionary, incorporate kabbalistic themes through his own poetic language and concern with human and divine unity. His influence is in the
Religious-Zionist community, who follow his aim that the
legal and
imaginative aspects of Judaism should interfuse:
"Due to the alienation from the 'secret of God' [i.e. Kabbalah], the higher qualities of the depths of Godly life are reduced to trivia that do not penetrate the depth of the soul. When this happens, the most mighty force is missing from the soul of nation and individual, and Exile finds favor essentially... We should not negate any conception based on rectitude and awe of Heaven of any form—only the aspect of such an approach that desires to negate the mysteries and their great influence on the spirit of the nation. This is a tragedy that we must combat with counsel and understanding, with holiness and courage."
[70]
[edit] See also
Historical development:
General:
- ^ Kabbalah: A very short introduction, Joseph Dan, Oxford University Press, Chapter 1 "The term and its uses"
- ^ "Imbued with Holiness" - The relationship of the esoteric to the exoteric in the fourfold Pardes interpretation of Torah and existence. From www.kabbalaonline.org
- ^ "The Freedom" by Yehuda Ashlag, "Baal HaSulam"
- ^ Shnei Luchot HaBrit, R. Isaiah Horowitz, Toldot Adam, Beit haChokhma, 14
- ^ Jewishencyclopedia.com - ZOHAR
- ^ The Written Law (The Torah)
- ^ Kabbalah: A very short introduction, Joseph Dan, Oxford University Press, Chapters on "the emergence of Medieval Kabbalah" and "doctrines of Medieval Kabbalah"
- ^ Moshe Idel, Hasidism: Between Ecstasy and Magic, p. 31
- ^ Megillah 14a, Shir HaShirim Rabbah 4:22, Ruth Rabbah 1:2, Aryeh Kaplan Jewish Meditation: A Practical Guide pp.44–48
- ^ Yehuda Ashlag; Preface to the Wisdom of Truth p.12 section 30 and p.105 bottom section of the left column as preface to the "Talmud Eser HaSfirot"
- ^ See Shem Mashmaon by Rabbi Shimon Agasi. It is a commentary on Otzrot Haim by Haim Vital. In the introduction he list five major schools of thought as to how to understand the Haim Vital's understanding of the concept of Tzitzum.
- ^ See Yechveh Daat Vol 3, section 47 by Rabbi Ovadiah Yosef
- ^ See Ktavim Hadashim published by Rabbi Yaakov Hillel of Ahavat Shalom for a sampling of works by Haim Vital attributed to Isaac Luria that deal with other works.
- ^ Kabbala goes to yeshiva | Jerusalem Post
- ^ Introduction to Raziel Hamalach
- ^ Stern, Schneur Zalman. Active vs. Passive Meditation
- ^ SparkNotes: The Kabbalah: Ma’aseh merkavah
- ^ SparkNotes: The Kabbalah: Ma’aseh bereshit
- ^ a b Artson, Bradley Shavit. From the Periphery to the Centre: Kabbalah and the Conservative Movement, United Synagogue Review, Spring 2005, Vol. 57 No. 2
- ^ Urbach, The Sages, pp.184ff.
- ^ Later, Elisha came to be considered heretical by his fellow Tannaim and the rabbis of the Talmud referred to him as Acher (אחר"The Other One").
- ^ Babylonian Talmud Hagigah 14b, Jerusalem Talmud Hagigah 2:1. This translation based on Braude, Ginzberg, Rodkinson, and Streane.
- ^ A. W. Streane, A Translation of the Treatise Chagigah from the Babylonian Talmud Cambridge University Press, 1891. p. 83.
- ^ Louis Ginzberg, Elisha ben Abuyah", Jewish Encyclopedia, 1901–1906.
- ^ Mishneh Torah, Yesodei Torah, Chapters 2-4.
- ^ The Zohar
- ^ Rabbi Abraham Ben Mordechai Azulai, Introduction to the book, Ohr HaChama [Light of the Sun]
- ^ Rabbi Avraham Azulai quoted in Erdstein, Baruch Emanuel. The Need to Learn Kabbala
- ^ The Kabbalah Centre
- ^ Shulhan Arukh YD 246:4
- ^ Shulhan Arukh 246:4 S"K 19[unreliable source?]
- ^ Joseph Dan, Kabbalah: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, chapter on the Contemporary Era
- ^ Such as the theological novel The Town Beyond The Wall by Elie Wiesel. Norman Lamm gives a Biblical, Midrashic and Kabbalistic exegesis of it in Faith and Doubt: Studies in Traditional Jewish Thought, Ktav pub.
- ^ Zohar I, 15a English translation from Jewish Mysticism - An Anthology, Dan Cohn-Sherbok, Oneworld pub, p.120-121
- ^ See Otzrot Haim: Sha'ar TNT"A for a short explanation. The vast majority of the Lurianic system deals only with the complexities found in the world of Atzilut as is explained in the introductions to both Otzrot Haim and Eitz Haim.
- ^ The Song of the Soul, Yechiel Bar-Lev, p.73
- ^ J.H.Laenen, Jewish Mysticism, p.164
- ^ Wineberg, chs. 20–21
- ^ [1] ban on Practical Kabbalah in our times, [2] practical use of amulets by Sages
- ^ Piero Cantoni, "Demonology and Praxis of Exorcism and of the Liberation Prayers", in Fides Catholica 1 (2006. [3])
- ^ Joseph Dan, Kabbalah: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford, chapter on "Christian Kabbalah"
- ^ (Otzar Eden Ganuz, Oxford Ms. 1580, fols. 163b-164a; see also Hayei Haolam Haba, Oxford 1582, fol. 12a)
- ^ Joseph Dan, Kabbalah: A Very Short Introduction, tentative analysis of Gershom Scholem and Isaiah Tishby of Luria's scheme
- ^ Moshe Cordovero, Or Ha-Hammah on Zohar III, 106a
- ^ Sirach iii. 22; compare Talmud, Hagigah, 13a; Midrash Genesis Rabbah, viii.
- ^ Overview of Hasidut from www.inner.org
- ^ The Founder of Hasidism, the Baal Shem Tov, cautioned against the layman learning Kabbalah without its Hasidic explanation. He saw this as the cause of the contemporary mystical heresies of Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank. Cited in The Great Maggid by Jacob Immanuel Schochet, quoting Derech Mitzvosecha by Menachem Mendel Schneersohn
- ^ Moshe Idel
- ^ Daniel C. Matt
- ^ Moshe Idel, Hasidism: Between Ecstasy and Magic, p.28
- ^ Sitra Achra
- ^ Chabad.org: Kelipot and Sitra Achra, Nissan Dovid Dubov Chabad.org
- ^ Arich Anpin
- ^ Fundamentals of Jewish Mysticism and Kabbalah By Ron H. Feldman. Pg. 59
- ^ סידור הרב, שער אכילת מצה
- ^ a b Dov Ber Pinson, Reincarnation and Judaism
- ^ ר' אברהם חן, ביהדות התורה
- ^ article, The Seductiveness of Jewish Myth
- ^ Love of one's Neighbour in Pinhas Hurwitz's Sefer ha-Berit, Resianne Fontaine, Studies in Hebrew Language and Jewish Culture, Presented to Albert van der Heide on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday, p.244-268.
- ^ Israel and Humanity, Elijah Benamozegh, Paulist Press, 1995
- ^ Wolfson, E.R. Venturing Beyond: Law and Morality in Kabbalistic Mysticism, Oxford University Press, 2006, ch.1.
- ^ Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson, From the Periphery to the Center: Kabbalah & Conservative Judaism
- ^ Joseph Dan, Kabbalah: A Very Short Introduction, chapters on Christian Kabbalah and the Contemporary Era
- ^ "On Authentic Sources" by Rav Michael Laitman
- ^ "The Teaching of the Kabbalah and Its Essence" by Rabbi Yehuda Ashlag, the "Baal HaSulam"
- ^ Kabbalah.com
- ^ newkabbalah.com website including the published English-language books of Sanford Drob
- ^ Sanford Drob, Symbols of the Kabbalah: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives, Jason Aronson publishers, p.xvi-xvii. Comparisons of the Lurianic scheme to Hegel, Freud and Jung are treated in respective chapters of Sanford Drob, Kabbalistic Metaphors: Jewish Mystical Themes in Ancient and Modern Thought, Aronson. The modern disciplines are explored as particular intellectual/emotional perspectives into the inclusive supra-rational Lurianic symbolism, from which both emerge enriched
- ^ HaYom Yom, Kehot publications, p. 110
- ^ Rabbi Avraham Yitzchak HaCohen Kook (Orot 2)
[edit] References
- Bodoff, Lippman; "Jewish Mysticism: Medieval Roots, Contemporary Dangers and Prospective Challenges"; The Edah Journal 2003 3.1
- Dan, Joseph; The Early Jewish Mysticism, Tel Aviv: MOD Books, 1993.
- Dan, Joseph; The Heart and the Fountain: An Anthology of Jewish Mystical Experiences, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
- Dan, Joseph; "Samael, Lilith, and the Concept of Evil in Early Kabbalah", AJS Review, vol. 5, 1980.
- Dan, Joseph; The ‘Unique Cherub’ Circle, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1999.
- Dan, J. and Kiener, R.; The Early Kabbalah, Mahwah, N.J.: Paulist Press, 1986.
- Dennis, G.; The Encyclopedia of Jewish Myth, Magic, and Mysticism, St. Paul: Llewellyn Worldwide, 2007.
- Fine, Lawrence, ed. Essential Papers in Kabbalah, New York: NYU Press, 1995.
- Fine, Lawrence; Physician of the Soul, Healer of the Cosmos: Isaac Luria and his Kabbalistic Fellowship, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.
- Fine, Lawrence; Safed Spirituality, Mahwah, N.J.: Paulist Press, 1989.
- Fine, Lawrence, ed., Judaism in Practice, Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001.
- Green, Arthur; EHYEH: A Kabbalah for Tomorrow. Woodstock: Jewish Lights Publishing, 2003.
- Grözinger, Karl E., Jüdisches Denken Band 2: Von der mittelalterlichen Kabbala zum Hasidismus, (Campus) Frankfurt /New York, 2005
- Hecker, Joel; Mystical Bodies, Mystical Meals: Eating and Embodiment in Medieval Kabbalah. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2005.
- Idel, Moshe; Kabbalah: New Perspectives. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1988.
- Idel, Moshe; The Golem: Jewish Magical and Mystical Traditions on the Artificial Anthropoid, New York: SUNY Press, 1990.
- Idel, Moshe; Hasidism: Between Ecstasy and Magic, New York: SUNY Press, 1995.
- Idel, Moshe; Kabbalistic Prayer and Color, Approaches to Judaism in Medieval Times, D. Blumenthal, ed., Chicago: Scholar's Press, 1985.
- Idel, Moshe; The Mystica Experience in Abraham Abulafia, New York, SUNY Press, 1988.
- Idel, Moshe; Kabbalah: New Perspectives, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1988.
- Idel, Moshe; Magic and Kabbalah in the ‘Book of the Responding Entity’; The Solomon Goldman Lectures VI, Chicago: Spertus College of Judaica Press, 1993.
- Idel, Moshe; "The Story of Rabbi Joseph della Reina"; Behayahu, M. Studies and Texts on the History of the Jewish Community in Safed.
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Jewish Encyclopedia. 1901–1906. - Kaplan, Aryeh; Inner Space: Introduction to Kabbalah, Meditation and Prophecy. Moznaim Publishing Corp 1990.
- John W. McGinley; 'The Written' as the Vocation of Conceiving Jewishly
- Samuel, Gabriella; "The Kabbalah Handbook: A Concise Encyclopedia of Terms and Concepts in Jewish Mysticism". Penguin Books 2007.
- Scholem, Gershom; Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism, 1941.
- Scholem, Gershom; Jewish Gnosticism, Merkabah Mysticism, and the Talmudic Tradition, 1960.
- Scholem, Gershom; Sabbatai Zevi, the Mystical Messiah, 1973.
- Scholem, Gershom; Kabbalah, Jewish Publication Society, 1974.
- Wineberg, Yosef; Lessons in Tanya: The Tanya of R. Shneur Zalman of Liadi (5 volume set). Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch, 1998.
- Wirszubski, Chaim; Pico della Mirandola's Encounter with Jewish Mysticism, Harvard University Press, 1989.
- Wolfson, Elliot; Through a Speculum That Shines: Vision and Imagination in Medieval Jewish Mysticism, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
- Wolfson, Elliot; Language, Eros Being: Kabbalistic Hermeneutics and Poetic Imagination, New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.
- Wolfson, Elliot; Venturing Beyond: Law and Morality in Kabbalistic Mysticism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
- Wolfson, Elliot; Alef, Mem, Tau: Kabbalistic Musings on Time, Truth, and Death, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.
- Wolfson, Elliot; Luminal Darkness: Imaginal Gleanings From Zoharic Literature, London: Onworld Publications, 2007.
- The Wisdom of The Zohar: An Anthology of Texts, 3 volume set, Ed. Isaiah Tishby, translated from the Hebrew by David Goldstein, The Littman Library.
[edit] External links
.jpg){kind=spacer}
